Translation and Characters of the Japanese Word Atari

You probably recognize the Japanese word  atari,  particularly if you grew up playing on the popular gaming system of the same name. But the word actually means neighborhood, or  in the same vicinity as, or the surroundings. Pronounced just as it is spelled, the context of the word helps to define its specific meaning. Japanese Characters 㠁‚㠁Ÿã‚Š Example Atari niwa fukai kiri ga tachikometeita.㠁‚㠁Ÿã‚Šã  «Ã£  ¯Ã¦ · ±Ã£ â€žÃ©Å" §Ã£ Å'ç «â€¹Ã£  ¡Ã£ â€œÃ£â€š Ã£  ¦Ã£ â€žÃ£ Å¸Ã£â‚¬â€š Translation:  A dense fog lay all around.

Legalization Of Same Sex Marriage - 1782 Words

Gabi Smith October 20, 2014 English 4 Mr. Pakula Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage Everyone has the right to be with the person they love. Nobody, not even the government, should be able to take that kind of happiness and freedom away from someone. If a girl loves another girl or a guy loves another guy, it should not matter to anyone else as long as they are happy together. â€Å"We are all equals in the world whether we are Black, White, Hispanic, Indian, or any other race for that matter. Why should we not be equals based on sexuality orientation† (Gay Marriage Pros and Cons)? Everyone deserves to have the same equal rights. Everyone has different beliefs and nothing can or will change that. Some people believe in same-sex marriage and some people do not, but there is still no reason to dislike or judge people that believe in something someone else does not believe in. Not everyone in the world has the same beliefs. That is life, it happens. So what is the point of being so against this one belief? Same sex couples do not walk around bashing on straight people for the person they love, so why can’t all straight couples do the same thing and not bash on same sex couples? Not only is this situation against some people’s beliefs, but it also is against the constitution. â€Å"The first amendment of the constitution states that a person’s religious beliefs or lack of thereof must be protected. Legislatures also cannot discriminate against marriages of the minority party whichShow MoreRelatedLegalization Of Same Sex Marriage Essay963 Words   |  4 PagesKaye Shannelle Romuar Alfritz Arevalo Angelika Figueroa Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage I. Introduction Same-sex marriage can also be called gay marriage. This is a marriage between two males or two females, in either a religious setting or in a civil ceremony. Same-sex unions are recorded in the history of a number of cultures but this type of marriage is rare, or doesn’t exist in other cultures .The first law that provided same-sex marriage for the people was in 2001 in the Netherlands. As of JulyRead MoreLegalization Of Same Sex Marriage1594 Words   |  7 PagesWhy The Nationwide Legalization Of Same Sex Marriage Will Greatly Benefit The Economy Same-sex marriage has been a long debated issue in the United States. Since the nationwide legalization of same-sex marriage in countries such as Holland, Belgium, and Canada American gay couples have been pushing harder for equal marriage rights under the law. Opponents claim that allowing same-sex unions would not only lead to less stable marriages and higher divorce rates for heterosexual couples, but also precipitateRead MoreThe Legalization Of Same Sex Marriage930 Words   |  4 Pagesof legalizing same-sex marriage all across the nation, after years of social, political, and cultural mobilizations of members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community and allies. However, this achievement is not an end it itself. Leaders of the marriage equality movement, as well as community members, ask: Now what? This proposed project attempts to provide an answer for this question by looking at the perceived impact of the legalization of same-sex marriage among Black LG BTsRead MoreThe Legalization Of Same Sex Marriage938 Words   |  4 PagesRights To All Most people believe that they deserve the rights they are granted by the government. A citizen who pays their taxes, serves their community and abides by the law should be afforded the same rights as any American. However, not all citizens are afforded equal rights. Lesbians, gays, bi-sexual, and transgender (LGBT) are consistently denied rights that are typically taken for granted by the average American. Specifically, gay and lesbians couples are denied the right to marry even ifRead MoreThe Legalization Of Same Sex Marriage2317 Words   |  10 PagesCavataio PHL 118: Intro to Philosophy 8/14/14 Gary Fuller One of the most heated and debated topics today is the legalization of same-sex marriage. No matter where you look, people are always expressing their opinion on this issue. Politicians, athletes, and celebrities are some of the many people who continually come out with either support or opposition of same-sex marriage. History has shown that issues regarding equality and rights take time to move forward. The women’s suffrage movementRead MoreThe Legalization Of Same Sex Marriage1091 Words   |  5 PagesThe legalization of same-sex marriage is a hot topic in the U.S. approving, it in all fifty states can be harmful to the country. Same-sex marriage should not have been legalized in the United States. First, legalizing can be harmful to the society, Second, same-sex marriage it always denies a child a father or a mother, Third, legalizing It Offends some religions and violates tradition. In addition, It means all citizens should have understood of the consequences before maki ng the decision. OneRead MoreThe Legalization Of Same Sex Marriage1411 Words   |  6 PagesNikta Kalatari Writing Assignment #1 The proposead legalization of same-sex marriage is one of the most significant issues in contemporary American family law. Presently, it is one of the most vigorously advocated reforms discussed in law reviews, one of the most explosive political questions facing lawmakers, and one of the most provocative issues emerging before American courts. If same-sex marriage is legalized, it could be one of the most revolutionary policy decisions in the history of AmericanRead MoreThe Legalization Of Same Sex Marriage1294 Words   |  6 Pages The Legalization of Homosexual Marriage Brandon Taylor Wichita State University Gay marriage, also known as homosexual or same-sex marriage, has been a major topic in our country ever since it was allowed in Massachusetts whenever the state’s Supreme Court ruled the ban as unconstitutional. It was legalized in thirty seven of the fifty states before the Supreme Court’s ruling on June 26, 2015 that it was unconstitutional to deny marriage to a same sex couple (ProCon.org, 2015). The Merriam-WebsterRead MoreLegalization Of Same Sex Marriages1390 Words   |  6 PagesLegalization of Same Sex Marriages As a Muslim, in my opinion same sex marriage is not right and same sex marriage should not be legalized. Out of this statement comes the question: what is the purpose and meaning of marriage. Can we ever explain marriage in the context of a bond between two males or two females. Can this relationship be called a â€Å"Marriage†? Whether we disguise this relationship with the label of marriage, does it become accepted into society as a real marriage? Or are we foolingRead MoreThe Legalization of Same Sex Marriage 1623 Words   |  6 Pageshow the citizens value their morals. An every day American would think that being with the same sex is not normal, or is frowned upon. Recent studies show that half of all Americans believe that gay men and lesbians have a constitutional right to marry (Craighill). Same-sex marriage has caused many conflicts around the country and even the world with multiple stand points. World views on same-sex marriage are changing day to day. â€Å"Of the 15 countries worldwide to permit gay men and lesbians to marry

Apology by Plato free essay sample

The Apology is an account by Plato of Socrates’ speech given at his trial in 399 BC. Socrates was an Athenian philosopher accused of two crimes: corrupting the youth and not believing in the gods. In Socrates’ speech, he explains to a jury of 501 Athenians why he is not guilty of the crimes he is accused of. He uses a variety of logical arguments to refute his charges yet in the end he is still found guilty and sentenced to death (Grube 21). Socrates’ use of logos and his absence of the use of pathos makes for an extremely logical speech, however his guilty verdict raises questions about the legal systems and society of Athens at the time, the importance of ethos when defending yourself in the court of law, and even the society of modern day. For the majority of his life, Socrates spent a good deal of his time asking questions of the people of Athens. His goal was to arrive at a set of political and ethical truths. Contrary to many people at the time, Socrates did not lecture about the things he knew; he actually claimed to be rather ignorant. He claimed he was wise only because he recognized his ignorance and did not claim to know what he did not know (Grube 26). The questions Socrates asked forced his audiences to think through a problem and arrive at a logical conclusion. At times, the answers seemed so obvious his opponents often looked foolish. His â€Å"Socratic Method† of questioning as it came to be called later, was adored by Socrates’ followers but despised by others throughout Athens (â€Å"Socrates Biography. †). Five years prior to 399 BC, Athens had just suffered a defeat to the Spartans, bringing an end to the Peloponnesian War. Its once strong democracy was taken over by Thirty Tyrants for nine months who executed over one thousand Athenians. However, by the end of nine months, an army of democrats restored democracy to Athens, but not without losing significant power in the Greek world (Colaiaco 13). This political turmoil and fear of losing more power in Greece set the stage for Socrates’ trial. Socrates begins his speech by establishing his ethos, meaning his credibility as a speaker. However, he does so in an unconventional matter. Rather than boasting of his speaking abilities and asserting himself as a wise and reliable source of information, he instead begins by saying, â€Å"I show myself not to be an accomplished speaker at all. † He even says that he was almost â€Å"carried away† by his accusers during their speech due to their persuasive speaking (Grube 22). Socrates goes on to say that he does not know the correct way to speak in the court of law, so the jury will have to excuse his unusual dialect (23). Socrates’ opening statements probably seemed absurd to the 501 jurors. Why would a man on trial and facing death begin his speech by claiming to be a terrible speaker? Socrates set up his speech this way for a specific reason. Besides the main two accusations against Socrates, corrupting the youth and being an atheist, he was also accused of making the weaker argument into the stronger (24). Due to this accusation, Socrates may have felt the need to downplay his speaking skills to the jurors. The jury could have been biased going into the trial thinking that no matter what Socrates said they should not believe him because of his reputation as a â€Å"persuasive† speaker. By weakening his ethos at the beginning of his speech, Socrates could then go on to give an argument that would be less affected by the jury’s previous opinion of him. As the speech goes on, he begins to subtly build his ethos back up. Within the claims he makes to the audience, he references witnesses as proof to the claims rather than just his spoken word. For example, when explaining to the jury that he possesses â€Å"human wisdom† he says, â€Å"I will refer to a trustworthy source. I shall call upon the god at Delphi as witness to the existence and nature of my wisdom† (25). Rather than simply making a claim to the jury, he backs up his claim with a witness, and a respected witness at that, a God. This technique forces the jurors who may still be wary about the trustworthiness of Socrates due to his persuasive reputation to believe him. Additionally, it proves that Socrates does in fact believe in the gods contrary to the accusations made against him. He then goes on to criticize his accusers, (Meletus, Anytus, and Lycon), using logical arguments to make their accusations seem unthoughtful and rash, which in turn destroys their ethos (30). After Socrates’ initial introduction, he begins laying out his arguments against his accusations with the use of logos, or persuasion by means of logic and reasoning. Socrates begins first with the claim that he corrupts the youth. He directly asks Meletus who he thinks â€Å"improves† the youth. Meletus first responds with â€Å"the laws,† but Socrates refuses to accept that answer. He wants to know exactly who improves them. Meletus goes on to say after a bit more questioning that all of Athens improves the youth besides Socrates. This opens the door for Socrates to use his first logical appeal. He asks Meletus, â€Å"Tell me: does this also apply to horses, do you think? That all men improve them and one individual corrupts them? † (Grube 29). Socrates says this is absurd and that it is in fact the opposite. He declares that only a few people who are actually horse breeders can improve horses, and that the majority would corrupt them. Using this example, Socrates claims that it must be the same with humans and subtly hints that he is actually the one improving all of Athens whereas the majority are the ones corrupting it. After this explanation, Socrates states that Meletus has not given any thought about the accusations he has brought Socrates to trial for (30). The combination of Socrates’ logical appeal and his attack on Meletus’ character makes the jury question Meletus’ ethos as Socrates prepares for his next argument, which is another appeal to the claim that he corrupts the youth. He asks Meletus, â€Å"does the man exist who would rather be harmed than benefited by his associates? † Meletus answers no. Socrates then asks Meletus whether he thinks Socrates corrupts the youth deliberately or by accident, and Meletus answers deliberately. Next, Socrates explains that if those two statements are true, he cannot be guilty. It would be senseless for him to corrupt the youth because if he did he would be at risk of being harmed him in some way by them too. Likewise, if Socrates did corrupt them, he would be doing so unintentionally. In that case, Socrates says his wrongdoings should simply be pointed out and corrected, not put on trial in the court of law (30). At this point in the speech, Socrates has countered the first accusation against him but is still faced with refuting the second. On top of corrupting the youth, Meletus claims that Socrates does not believe in the Gods. Socrates starts his argument by once again trying to make Meletus out to be an unreliable source lacking ethos. He mocks Meletus’ accusation against him by saying, â€Å"’Socrates is guilty of not believing in the gods, but believing in gods,’ and surely that is the part of a jester! † (Grube 31). Socrates goes on to explain this statement in further detail proving why Meletus’ claims are so absurd. He asks Meletus, â€Å"Does any man believe in spiritual activities who does not believe in spirits? † Meletus reluctantly answers that no one does. Socrates then points out that Meletus says that he believes in â€Å"spiritual activities† which sets up Socrates’ next question. He asks, â€Å"Do we not believe spirits to be either gods or the children of gods? Yes or no? † Meletus agrees that this is true. Finally, with the information gathered from questioning, Socrates constructs his logical argument. He pronounces that if it is true that he believes in spirits, and spirits are either gods or children of the gods, Meletus’ argument is invalid and contradictory (32). Socrates is trying to convey to the jury that if the answers to his questions are true as Meletus says himself they are, Socrates must be undeniably not guilty, for in order to prove his guilt, the questions would have to be false. Socrates’ speech is full of logical arguments, but it is almost entirely lacking of any pathos, meaning appeals to the jury’s emotions. However, Socrates is almost proud of this fact. Towards the end of his speech he talks about his reasoning for not using pathos. Socrates describes a man on trial who begged and pleaded with the jury, and who brought his children, family, and friends in an attempt to evoke pity from the jurors. He then says, â€Å"I do none of these things, even though I may seem to be running the ultimate risk† (Grube 38). Socrates says that to do such things â€Å"would be a disgrace† (39). He feels that appealing to the jury’s emotions in an attempt to achieve innocence is dishonorable and unjust. Socrates strongly believes in the difference between right and wrong and the value of his reputation when it comes to those aspects of life. He says, â€Å"I do not think it right to supplicate the jury and to be acquitted because of this, but to teach and persuade them† (39). Socrates would rather argue his case honorably using his methods of logic, than use crafty means of emotional appeal to win his case. In the end, Socrates’ rational arguing was not enough to prove his innocence to the jury. He was found guilty and sentenced to death. As a modern reader, one would think that Socrates clearly proved his innocence and that the law and society of Athens at the time had to have been corrupt. However, the Apology raises an Important question about the present day: is society really that much different now? For instance, in a 2001 interview with Bill O’Reilly, rock star Marilyn Manson was questioned about his effects on the youth of the world. Many parents claim that Manson is a bad influence on their children due to his lyrically explicit songs, religious beliefs, and unusual appearance and attire. However, when asked by O’Reilly what message he was trying to convey through his lyrics, Manson replied, â€Å"I try and take everyone’s ideals, common morals, flip them around, make people look at them differently, question them†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (â€Å"Marilyn Manson. †). Socrates and Manson seem to share quite similar views. Socrates was always questioning people about their morals and beliefs in an attempt to arrive at some sort of ethical truth. Manson seems to have a similar goal in mind. So why then does a good portion of society shun Manson for being a corrupter of the youth while Socrates is now generally praised for doing a very similar thing at his time? It seems that if the concepts outlined in the Apology are applied to the modern day, our society as a whole has not changed all that much. We still feel that a few individuals can corrupt an entire nation of youth, whereas the majority is thought to be on the right track for improving them. If the ideas of Socrates are truly compared to that of a modern day radical thinker such as Manson, it is fairly easy to see how the Athenians found his philosophies so bizarre. Socrates’ unique use of rhetorical appeals in the Apology made for a surprisingly convincing speech. His lack of ethos at the beginning of the speech along with his complete absence of pathos made for an unusual form of dialect in terms of the conventions of rhetoric. However, Socrates’ extensive use of logos and his distinct method of questioning forced his audience to think logically about the accusations made against him and the legitimacy of those accusations. The fact that the Athenian jury found Socrates guilty brings into question the political and social issues Athens faced at the time, but also raises questions about whether modern society is any different. Socrates’ ideas still echo throughout today’s world and his use of logical arguments will undoubtedly be imitated and refined for many years to come.

Strategic Marketing Methods

Question: Discuss about theStrategic Marketing Methods. Answer: Introduction Marketing management in business today is faced with the challenge of changing trends in business practices and the development and use of technology has helped organizations in coming up with techniques and methods for marketing. In order to market products, organizations have to analyze consumer behavior and consumption needs which are influenced by factors such as the quality and cost of the product and the availability. For instance, the Nestle Company which produces Nestum 3in1 is an internationally recognized brand which has to incorporate the market orientation, techniques in ensuring that the produce receives international reception among its different markets. Therefore, the focus of this paper is to analyze the different marketing orientation techniques by Nestle in order to segment its target population by positioning their product in the global marketplace. Segmentation, Targeting, and Positioning This model is applicable in marketing in the sense that it creates priorities in marketing through segmentation of the population and creation of communication messages which target the specific population through personalized and relevancy in messages and thus the organization makes production decisions based on the market needs and thus this method is practical to organizations today (Hanlon, 2016, p. 7). Segmentation in marketing means identification of the customers and delivering of the products when and where the customers are located which is referred to as geographic segmentation. Segmentation is about creating relationships with the different stakeholders involved in the production and supply chain and thus the organization engages in target promotional activities which addresses the different audiences for its products. Nestum 3in1 has achieved global recognition and use by the segmentation and targeting of the populations in the US and other markets worldwide (Weinstein, 2013, p. 4). Upon proper segmentation of the market thus the organization identifies the attractiveness and potential presented by each market segment and thus the suitable one is the target for the product. For instance, the case of Nestum 3in1 was a product innovation which targeted the American and other western adult population between the ages of 5-85 years. Segmentation involved the partnership with Eu Yan Sang, a trusted household name and Asias leading progressive healthcare company with a strong foundation in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). The specific needs address the psychographic and behavioral needs of the population, thus the Nestum 3in1 fits the hectic lifestyle while embracing healthy eating habits (Nestle, 2012, p. 1). The STP strategy involves selecting targets for the product which are chosen on the basis of the market size given the population size and composition. The existence of Nestle in many markets makes the brand to be receptive and thus the introduction of a new product by the company will receive positive reception and thus anticipated growth in terms of sales and revenue (Weinstein, 2013, p. 4). Product positioning in the market involves the analysis on the market position of the company and brand in general in the market and an evaluation of the competition in order to identify opportunities through gap identification. Perceptual mapping identifies competitors in the global market producing healthy drinks and cereals such as Weetabix, cornflakes, cocoa puffs among others products and thus given the competition the company is able to set strategies to meet the market needs while remaining competitive. Nestum 3in1 has presented the population with a healthy drink and instant preparation thus positioning itself in the market as the choice of convenience and efficiency for its users whose lifestyle and behavior require such a product (Hanlon, 2016, p. 7). Nestle is able to develop marketing objectives of its product Nestum 3in1 in different markets. Given the reception in the Asia markets the objective of increasing the growth and market share by 5% in the global market by end of half year 2017. The objective which aligns with company goals of profitability is the increase in sales revenue by 17% through diversification of product to target adults and children in different markets (Nestle, 2012, p. 1). Strategies for Objective Attainment The STP method in identifying the target population for the Nestum product is key in the development of strategies applicable by Nestle in sustainability and profitability goals. Engaging in promotional activities such as advertisement which is aided by the digitized marketing place in the globe is an advantage for the success of Nestle. Another strategy is the product innovation and diversification, this entails the utilization of partnerships which will ensure quality and diversity in terms of consumer needs is met (Blythe and Zimmerman, 2012, 17). Bibliography Blythe, Jim, and Alan S. Zimmerman. Business to Business Marketing Management: A Global Perspective. London: Routledge, 2012. "The New NESTL NESTUM 3 in 1 Cereal Drinks." Http://www.nestle.com.my. Last modified October 1, 2012. https://www.nestle.com.my/media/pressreleases/allpressreleases/the_new_nestle_nestum_3in1_cereal_drink. Hanlon, AnnMarie. "The Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning Model." Smart Insights. Last modified November 8, 2016. https://www.smartinsights.com/digital-marketing-strategy/customer-segmentation-targeting/segmentation-targeting-and-positioning/. Weinstein, Art. Handbook of Market Segmentation: Strategic Targeting for Business and Technology Firms, Third Edition. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2013.